A Review of Transportation and Urban System in Istanbul via Innovation Process

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors

1 ISTANBUL TICARET UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING FACULTY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

2 ISTANBUL MEDENIYET UNİVERSITY ENGINEERING FACULTY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

Abstract

Highways in Turkey have a high share on modal distribution and mass transportation cannot get the share that it needs to be, so this case makes traffic problems getting worse. Local governments are aiming to manage the cities more effectively with innovative decision process. To minimize traffic congestion and congestion-related problems technical solutions, political decisions, and society management about changing habit culture habits are required. Urbanization, digitalization and sustainability are the mobility phenomena of 21st century. Intelligent transportation system has a unique role at this mentioned position for all elements, stakeholders and parties. Transportation policies and innovative approaches are necessary at this point. And an integrated plan and approach have a vital role for all stakeholders and the society. At this point in Turkey, big cities have some constitutional problems for years. Istanbul is a unique mega city in the country and all over the world. Government has to think and apply by a high level technique and hardware to this issue. Solutions for Istanbul o transportation and urbanization will be a huge experience for developed and developing countries. In this paper data on modal distribution of transportation modes in Istanbul are presented and the effect of mass transport in the city of Istanbul, especially the seaways is examined. This table is evaluated comparison to Bosporus bridges access traffic conditions.

Keywords

References

Altan, M. F., & Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2020). A review of comparison of high-speed railway passenger and freight transport on a global scale. Dicle University Engineering Faculty Journal.
Altan, M. F., & Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2018). Multi-objective decision on mass transport and modeling of home-work transport service in a metropolitan region. Karaelmas Science and Engineering Journal.
Altan, M. F., Kızıltaş, M. Ç., & Ayözen, Y. E. (2020). Comparative evaluation of the development, current situation, and investment plans of high-speed railways on national, regional, and international bases. İstanbul Aydın University, IJEMME.
Altan, M. F., Kızıltaş, M. Ç., & Ayözen, Y. E. (2020). High-speed railways: Current status and development trends at the international scale and Turkey. İstanbul Aydın University, IJEMME.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Research and Innovative Technology Administration. (2011). Key transport indicators.
Campisi, T., Russo, A., Bouhouras, E., Tesoriere, G., & Basbas, S. (2023). The increase in e-commerce purchases and the impact on the newest European city logistics development. The Open Transportation Journal, 17(1).
Chen, Z. (2017). Impacts of high-speed rail on domestic air transportation in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 62, 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.04.002
Combes, P. P., Mayer, T., & Thisse, J. F. (2008). Economic geography: The integration of regions and nations. Princeton University Press.
Gerçek, H., & Demir, O. (2015). Eskişehir transportation main plan revision study.
Herawatie, D., Siswanto, N., & Widodo, E. (2024). Motorcycle taxi in shared mobility and informal transportation: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 10(2), 250-269.
Ilıcalı, M., Camkesen, N., Kızıltaş, M. Ç., & Ekinci, B. (2014). Intermodal integration and Bosphorus accesses on the transport system of İstanbul. 5th Highway Traffic Safety Symposium and Fair, Ankara.
Ilıcalı, M., Çatbaş, N., Öngel, A., & Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2014). Multimodal transportation issues in Istanbul: A case study for traffic redistribution due to long-span bridge rehabilitation. Advances in Civil Engineering and Building Materials III, 413-417.
Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2016). European Union and transportation policies-5. Retrieved from http://www.ulastirmadunyasi.com/?p=8 (Accessed August 8, 2016).
Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2016). Globally scale improvements in railway systems and İstanbul-3. Retrieved from http://www.ulastirmadunyasi.com/?p=8 (Accessed August 8, 2016).
Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2014). Marineways in İstanbul-2. Retrieved from http://www.ulastirmadunyasi.com/index.php/2015/12/istanbulda-deniz-ulasimi-2/ (Accessed June 24, 2014).
Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2014). Marineways in İstanbul-5. Retrieved from http://www.ulastirmadunyasi.com/index.php/2015/12/istanbulda-deniz-ulasimi-5/ (Accessed July 24, 2015).
Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2014). Transportation developments and Marmaray-7. Retrieved from http://www.ulastirmadunyasi.com/index.php/2014/12/ulastirma-yatirimlari-ve-marmaray-7/ (Accessed April 24, 2014).
Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2018). Mass transport with global examples. Transist 2018, Istanbul Transportation Congress and Fair, İstanbul.
Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2018). Transportation investments and economic development evaluation. Transist 2018, İstanbul Transportation Congress and Fair, November 8-10, 2018, İstanbul.
Kızıltaş, M. Ç. (2018). Urbanization and transportation examples on an international scale. Transist 2018, İstanbul Transportation Congress and Fair, November 8-10, 2018, İstanbul.
Kızıltaş, M. Ç., & Altan, M. F. (2018). A review in terms of service parameters on modal choices and mass transport. İzmir.
Kızıltaş, M. Ç., & Altan, M. F. (2017). Evaluation of intermodal integration in the context of Marmaray and Bosphorus Bridges. IRF Regional Congress, Dubai.
Litman, T. (2013). Understanding transport demands and elasticities: How prices and other factors affect travel behavior. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/elasticities
Mahdzir, A., Xuan, H., Yu, N., Tiean, T., & Kun, T. (2024). The review of recent trends for the school bus routing problem. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Physics, 6(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.33093/jetap.2024.6.1.9
Marsh, M. T., & Shilling, D. A. (1994). Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 1-17.
Mavlutova, I., Atstaja, D., Grasis, J., Kuzmina, J., Uvarova, I., & Roga, D. (2023). Urban transportation concept and sustainable urban mobility in smart cities: A review. Energies, 16(8), 3585.
Perugia, A., Moccia, L., Cordeau, J., & Laporte, G. (2011). Designing a home-to-work bus service in a metropolitan area. Transportation Research Part A, 63, 232–244.
Rawat, D. B., Rodrigues, J. J., & Stojmenovic, I. (2015). Cyber-physical systems: From theory to practice. CRC Press.
Román, C., Espino, R., & Martín, J. C. (2010). Analyzing competition between the high-speed train and alternative modes: The case of the Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona Corridor. Journal of Choice Modelling, 3(1), 84–108.
Roucolle, G. (2024). Transformations in mobility: Trends, disruptions, and the future of mobility and transportation. Kogan Page Publishers.
Sustainable Intra-City Mobility Plans (SUMP) Workshop Report. (2015). Liveable Cities Symposium, İstanbul Technical University (İTÜ).
TR 10th Development Plan Transportation and Traffic Safety Specialization Commission Report. (2012). Ankara.
Tzeng, G., & Shiau, T. (1988). Multiple-objective programming for bus operation: A case study for Taipei City. Transportation Research Part B, 22(3), 195-206.
Wong, W. G., Han, B. M., Ferreira, L., Zhu, X. N., & Sun, Q. X. (2002). Evaluation of management strategies for the operation of high-speed railways in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(3), 277-289.
Management Science and Information Technology
Volume 1, Issue 2
December 2024
Pages 88-98

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics