Management Science and Information Technology

Management Science and Information Technology

Negotiation and Bargaining Dynamics in Multi-Tier Supply Chains: Strategies, Power Dynamics, and the Role of Technology

Document Type : IIIEC 2025

Authors
Makan Moadi 1
Abdollah Arasteh 2
1 Industrial Engineering, babol noshirvani university of technology, Iran , Babol
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
10.22034/ISS.2025.9210.1036
Abstract
Objective: This study examines negotiation and bargaining dynamics in multi-tier supply chains, focusing on the interplay between distributive and integrative strategies, power imbalances, information asymmetries, and the emerging role of artificial intelligence (AI) in optimizing outcomes. The principal objective is to provide actionable insights for supply chain managers while advancing theoretical understanding of these interactions in complex, multi-tier networks across industries such as automotive, electronics, pharmaceuticals, agri-food, and e-commerce.
Methods: Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates a systematic literature review of 50 peer-reviewed studies, experimental simulations with participants representing supply chain firms, and five in-depth industry case studies. A game-theoretic model extends the Balanced Principal framework to predict profit distribution and negotiation equilibria under varying conditions of bargaining power, information access, and AI influence.
Results: Findings reveal that buyers with greater bargaining power capture up to 30% higher surplus, while integrative approaches enhance overall supply chain resilience by 25%. AI-powered tools reduce negotiation duration by 15% and improve equity in outcomes by mitigating information asymmetries and optimizing concession strategies.
Conclusion: Despite these advances, limitations include the controlled nature of experiments and the context-specific scope of case studies, which may limit generalizability. The study concludes that strategic adoption of integrative bargaining and AI technologies fosters sustainable inter-firm relationships, cost efficiency, and resilience in multi-tier supply chains, offering managers practical tools to balance competitive and collaborative tactics in an increasingly complex global environment.
Keywords
multi-tier supply chains
bargaining strategies
power imbalances
information asymmetries
artificial intelligence
Basanaboyina, S. B. (2025). Data-Driven AI: The Future of Business through Data-Driven Insights. International Journal of Scientific Research, 14(4). https: //doi.org/10.21275/SR25404224429   
Bendoly, E., Donohue, K., & Schultz, K. L. (2006). Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.10.001
Cachon, G. P., & Zhang, F. (2006). Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry. Management Science, 52(6), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0516
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in (3rd ed.). Penguin Books.
Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.657
Gurnani, H., & Shi, M. (2006). A bargaining model for a first-time interaction under asymmetric information in a supply chain. Management Science, 52(6), 865–880. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0498
Hu, S., Ma, Z.-J., & Sheu, J.-B. (2019). Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for successive-generation products with strategic consumers and limited trade-in duration. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 124, 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.02.004
Illouz, Y. (2025).  An Investigation of Emotion Regulation and Integrativity in Interpersonal Conflict Negotiations. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025. 31986392. https://www.proquest.com/openview/499896d9de00a6531aeed1867c252bf2/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=
Iqbal, T., Ali, S., & Khan, M. A. (2024). Blockchain-enabled transparency in agri-food supply chain negotiations. Business and Economic Review, 1(1), 45–62. https://bereview.pk/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/21
Ivanov, D., Das, A., & Choi, T. M. (2018). New flexibility drivers for manufacturing, service, and supply chain systems. International Journal of Production Research, 56(10), 3359–3368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1457813
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
Katok, E., & Wu, D. Y. (2009). Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Science, 55(12), 1953–1968. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1089
Kersten, G. E., & Lai, H. (2007). Negotiation support and e-negotiation systems: An overview. Group Decision and Negotiation, 16(6), 553–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9095-5
Küp, E. T., Türkmen, A. D., & Türkmen, A. (2025). A gamification framework for crowdsourced couriers: Turkish e-commerce logistic company case study. Management Science and Information Technology, 2(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.22034/ISS.2025.8415.1022
Mishra, R., & Masih, E. (2023). To Venture and Confirm Determinants Responsible for Role Conflict: A Critical Review. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.2644  
Namakula, S. J., Al-Sammarraie, N. A., & Mubuke, F. (2024). Factors inducing consumer’s behavioral intentions towards online shopping in developing countries. Management Science and Information Technology, 1(2), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.22034/ISS.2024.7833.1013
Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrical, 18(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907266
Polu, O. R. (2025). AI-Driven Automatic Code Refactoring for Performance Optimization. International Journal of Scientific Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10. 21275/SR25011114610   
Roth, A. E., Murnighan, J. K., & Schoumaker, F. (1988). The deadline effect in bargaining: Some experimental evidence. The American Economic Review, 78(4), 806–823.
Rubinstein, A. (1982). Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrical: Journal of the Econometric Society, 97-109.
Schmidt, L., Wagner, S. M., & Zhang, R. (2025). Human-AI collaboration in supply chain negotiations: Behavioral and operational insights. Group Decision and Negotiation, 32(4), 789–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-025-09920-5 
Sianturi, H. R & Anggara, R. (2025). Collaboration and Negotiation Practice by Students in News Production, 64, 112–123. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/kajian-jurnalisme/article/view/58470  
Van Dijk, P. (2024). AI-Driven Business Intelligence: Leveraging Predictive Analytics for Data-Driven Decision Making. International Journal of AI and Big Data in Cloud Management Systems, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416. IJAIBDCMS-V5I3P102   
Vyshnavi, D., & Begum, G. (2025). AI-Driven Material Selection. Global Engineering and New Technologies Innovations, 6. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6. 0525.1930
Management Science and Information Technology
Volume 2, Issue 2
Spring 2025
Pages 151-173